This video is a presentation of the evidence for the existence of Jesus. It uses only non- biblical sources and goes through the skeptical arguments for each claim. It will be surprising for some to see how much evidence for the historicity of Jesus there actually is, in fact there is more evidence for Jesus' existence, as you will see, than there is for most of the prominent figures in ancient history. *Warning* Watching this video will take away your ability to claim honestly that Jesus was a myth.
Unraveling the Connections between Aliens, Demons, and Christianity|With Dr. Brian Huffling--- "Non-Christian Academic Researchers Say Aliens Are Demons"
Potentially the Most Important Info You Will Ever Come Across... Or Maybe Not, But As the Boyscouts Say Always Be Prepared!
I've researched the afterlife for nearly 10 years. I am convinced that Reptilian beings are REAL and that the tunnel of light that people see when they die is a trap.---A now deleted comment mentioned that perhaps one can only be trapped if their consciousness resonates at a low vibration like the reptilians. I think there is wisdom there!
IS JESUS REAL? - NON-BIBLICAL EVIDENCE OF HIS EXISTENCE---How Can the Divinity of Christ Be Proven? How can we be certain about the identity of Jesus? Why would anyone believe He was something more than a mere man? How could we ever know for sure? Jesus’ Authority Was Based in His Deity---Evidence Humans Can Walk on Water---A THOUSAND WAYS TO WALK ON WATER! #PRAISEJESUS
If I argued for destroying the right to privacy because a few people misuse private chat features to sell drugs or whatever, you'd think I was nuts, right? And gun control won't do anything anyways. The UK has plenty of it and they now need metal detectors in schools and are melting down as a
society.
Editor's Note: Metal detectors is a great idea, as is armed guards and trained civilians, and as Styx points out, better mental health treatment, teachers, and parents, would be just grand as well.
Gun Control is a Snake Oil "Cure" for a Nonexistent Crisis
Related:
5 Points To Counter The NRA DEBUNKED - Penn & Teller Helps Gun Control Supporters Understand The 2nd Amendment:
Here’s a political endorsement Dems don’t want. Alleged college scammer Jane Buckingham — the marketing CEO accused of paying $50,000 for her son to get into the University of Southern California — was a co-host of a Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand fund-raiser days before the indictments hit.
Buckingham is listed as a co-host for a high-end Beverly Hills, Calif., event at the home of Los Angeles FC owner Larry Berg and his wife, Allison, last Saturday to fund Gillibrand’s exploratory 2020 presidential run.
Christopher Polk/Getty Images for Children’s Mending Hearts
Co-hosts also included Will Ferrell, “Scandal” creator Shonda Rhimes and her über agent Chris Silbermann, plus Harvard MBA and author Samantha Ettus. It cost donors $2,800 to be a co-host of the event.
9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Running Out Of Money, Plans To Reduce Future Payments | Nightly News
Related:
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D. NY) admits to 9/11 coverup by then FBI Director Robert Mueller when confronted at a town hall meeting with her constituency in NYC 8/8/2018...
Assumed presidential candidate, Kirsten Gillibrand, was asked about packing the Supreme Court with enough ultra-liberal judges to effectively make the Democrats the ruling party of the United States, right up until the time they completely destroy the country. The Constitution does not say how many justices there should be, so the plan is quite possible. Republicans need to beat them to the punch and if they regain control of the House, they should pack the court themselves. Imagine SCOTUS with 9 conservatives and 4 liberals. 10 to 3 if Ginsburg is finished. Liberalism would die a quick death.
Democratic 2020 presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand signaled her openness to expanding the Supreme Court beyond nine seats if her party retakes the Senate and the White House in the 2020 elections.
The Democratic Party’s left-wing base has increasingly pushed for extreme measures, including court-packing, in order to shift the ideological tilt of the nation’s highest court.
My book is here! And I personally handed a copy to our President at the White House!!! I hope you enjoy it @realDonaldTrump!
After initially opposing the idea of her home state granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants, U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand has had a change of heart.
Laura Loomer hired illegal aliens to raise a tent on Nancy Pelosi’s property. Watch as police confront the workers despite Nancy’s call to welcome all illegals into America.
“I think we have to make it possible for people to provide for their families,” the New York Democrat said Wednesday, as she was leaving to attend her 2020 presidential campaign kickoff event.
People wait in line outside of the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in Los Angeles, California (ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images)
Gillibrand’s new stand on the issue is in contrast from the position she took during her days in the House, when she opposed then-Gov. Eliot Spitzer’s controversial 2007 plan to allow illegal immigrants living in New York to obtain driver licenses.
MSM is distracting the American people from the real dangers along the southern border, while money from drug trafficking is being used to fund deep state operations in the U.S.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D. NY) admits to 9/11 coverup by then FBI Director Robert Mueller when confronted at a town hall meeting with her constituency in NYC 8/8/2018.
Hank Berrien for the Daily Wire reports, On Tuesday, New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind, who is Jewish, condemned New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand for associating with anti-Semitic Women’s March organizer Linda Sarsour.
The WSJ Rejects the Assumption of Guilt for Kavanaugh... Why Not for Youtubers? (Styx)
The WSJ comprehends that not all claims of guilt are the result of guilt existing, but has never retracted its bogus claims of extremist Youtubers; including when they name dropped me alongside Alex Jones.
RUSH: Jackie Speier, Democrat, California, had a press conference today along with Lois Frankel to demand a congressional investigation into Trump.
During the Q&A, Jackie Speier talked about the reasons behind the call for an investigation.
SPEIER: As you’re all aware, House Rule Ten gives the Congress of the United States, and particularly the House of Representatives, the authority to investigate anything at any time. And it is under that House rule that we are calling on the Government Oversight Committee to do the investigation. But what took place this morning when the president tweeted about our colleague, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, is grotesque. It took my breath away. And it represents the conduct of a person who is ill equipped to be the president of the United States.
RUSH: Oh, come on. Nobody believes you! Except your other insane leftists. Come on. Is Kirsten Gillibrand really made up of the flimsiest balsa wood that she can’t even handle a strong gust of wind? This is what our first caller was talking about. Why do you want us to believe that Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is so helpless and so frightened and so fragile and can’t handle the president saying something about her? For crying out loud!
Here’s Trump’s tweet. Now, Gillibrand had tweeted something about Trump. I mean, he didn’t start it. She starts something, so he responds. “Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office ‘begging’ for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!”
Now, what Jackie Speier and the rest of these babes are upset about is Trump saying that Kirsten Gillibrand would do anything for campaign contributions. They are saying that Trump is intimating that Kirsten Gillibrand would offer herself sexually to Trump for money, and they are outraged and they are offended and they are unbelieving how this could possibly stand!
Now, let me ask you a question. And, by the way, Gillibrand responded: “You cannot silence me or the millions of women who have gotten off the sidelines to speak out about the unfitness and shame you have brought to the Oval Office.” Now, if Trump had tweeted, “Chuck Schumer came to my office and he would do anything for campaign contributions,” what would people think Trump meant? Would somebody have thought he meant a Lewinsky? Well, that’s what they thought when he was talking about Kirsten Gillibrand.
They think Trump was intimating that she would offer Trump a Lewinsky if he would have donated to her cause. It’s in their minds, exactly. Not in Trump’s! It’s in their minds. They’re the ones that have the putrid, perverted thoughts in their minds. It’s not in Trump’s! They don’t know what Trump’s thinking. Do anything. Could be anything. But they zero in on that it is a Lewinsky.
What would they have thought if Trump said, “Chuck Schumer would do anything for campaign contributtions”? Would they have thought something sexual about that? What would men do to get money that’s not sexual? Pass laws favoring the contributor? Remove a regulation, grease a wheel, get an invite to the White House? Could be anything. And that could have been what Trump meant. She would have done anything for this.
But look at what these women zero in on. These women zero in on the fact that Trump was suggesting that Gillibrand would drop to her knees and do a Lewinsky. Didn’t Mitt Romney say that Trump would drop to his knee for — (interruption) Oh, that Mitt would drop to his knees for a campaign donation. Trump said that Mitt would do that, drop to his knees. But they weren’t outraged about that.
So now here is Kirsten Gillibrand with Christiane Amanpour sitting in for whoever on CNN International, says, “This is an unprecedented time in American politics. The world is gripped by this saga. Here it now takes aim squarely at Trump and this whole #MeToo movement gains momentum. Should the White House be worried, Senator?”
GILLIBRAND: President Trump should resign. These allegations are credible. They are numerous. I’ve heard these women’s testimony, and many of them are heartbreaking, and President Trump should resign his position. Whether he will ever hold himself accountable is something you really can’t hold your breath for, and so Congress should have hearings. They should do their investigation. They should have appropriate investigations of his behavior and hold him accountable. This is a very powerful moment in America’s history, and not only —
RUSH: It’s fake!
GILLIBRAND: — should they be heard, but they should be believed.
RUSH: Stop the tape. It’s fake! All of this is ginned up! It is a political opposition research strategy! All of this is fake. You have been building up to this. Everything these people do is fake. It’s all structured. It is all manufactured. And the voters saw it during the election and the Access Hollywood video release. And they’re seeing it in the same kind of orchestrated campaign that appears to be genuine and of the moment with Roy Moore, but it’s all planned, scripted, written out, timelined, as this is.
Now, all of a sudden when Franken’s gone and some others, now Congress needs to investigate Trump? And who’s out there digging up information for this? None other than the greatest reputation in all of Washington, Robert Mueller. The whole thing is ginned up, folks.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Stand by sound bite number 25. So Kirsten Gillibrand, for the last 20 years, madam, you supported, you endorsed, you hobnobbed, you took money from and God knows what else from the likes of Bill Clinton and Harvey Weinstein. You’re right in there with ’em. You’re defending Clinton, didn’t do anything wrong, nothing to keep you at your distance from him, he was a hero of yours just like he was the rest of the Democratic Party.
Harvey Weinstein, ditto. You never once tried to distance yourself from Weinstein before the story broke. You are right in there with ’em, Senator Gillibrand. Now all of a sudden you find religion. Now all of a sudden you are righteously offended, terribly indignant and stupefied at how the president could so disrespect you.
Well, Trump is right. You are a hypocrite, and more. You are the one not genuine. You’re the one perhaps who should be ashamed. You are the lightweight here, Ms. Gillibrand, Senator Gillibrand. The selective outrage so obviously part of an opposition research campaign.
And there you are, dependable as ever, willing to be the biggest hypocrite on earth, now that others, including you, have decided to throw Bill Clinton overboard which you probably don’t even really mean ’cause you didn’t do it when it mattered. You just did it to clear the decks for going after Trump. Here is Kirsten Gillibrand, now a victim, a helpless snowflake victim of Donald Trump’s tweets, words in the ether. Here’s what she said.
GILLIBRAND: It was a sexist smear attempting to silence my voice. And I will not be silenced on this issue. Neither will the women who stood up to the president yesterday, and neither will the millions of women who have been marching since the women’s march to stand up against policies they do not agree with.
RUSH: She’s a victim. She’s a victim of Trump’s tweets. So mean. It’s so unfair. But she’s not gonna be silenced, and neither are the other women wearing those vagina hats ever since the inauguration. Not a bit.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is at war with Donald Trump over accusations of sexual assault yet failed to disavow Bill Clinton over his far more substantial acts of sexual predation and has taken at least six political donations in the past from Harvey Weinstein.
Gillibrand told CNN on Monday that Trump “should be fully investigated and he should resign” over accusations that he assaulted women, adding, “President Trump has committed assault, according to these women, and those are very credible allegations of misconduct and criminal activity.”
Trump hit back this morning with a tweet in which he said Gillibrand was “someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them).”
The claims against Trump were already aired last year, and in one case directly disputed by an eyewitness, but are now being regurgitated in light of the #MeToo scandal.
Three women who appeared on the Today Show with Megyn Kelly yesterday re-told their stories but with seemingly inane new claims, including that Trump asked for one of their phone numbers and, in another case, Trump called one of them a rude word.
However, Democrats seem intent on sweeping up Trump in the outrage over the sexual assault scandal that has ensnared top names in both politics and Hollywood.
Ironic therefore that Gillibrand herself has been pictured with and politically aligned with several actual sexual predators during her career, including Harvey Weinstein.
The Senator’s ties with Weinstein run deeper than the occasional photo. Records show that the disgraced film producer donated money to Gillibrand’s political campaigns on at least six separate occasions.
While Weinstein only admitted to some of the claims against him this year, his notorious behavior with women was an open secret in Hollywood for decades.
Here’s Gillibrand appearing alongside Anthony Weiner, a convicted sex offender who transferred obscene material to a minor and is currently serving a 21 month prison sentence.
Gillibrand was also seemingly unperturbed by the innumerable accusations of sexual assault and rape against Bill Clinton. She did say Clinton should have resigned over his affair with Monica Lewinsky (20 years later), although that was a consensual relationship.
When Clinton campaigned for her in 2006, long after the rape and sexual assault accusations against him came to light, Gillibrand was happy to appear alongside Clinton.
While Gillibrand is demanding Trump resign over the relatively flimsy accusations against him, it’s unlikely she’ll be disavowing Clinton any time soon despite the claims against him being far more substantial.
This once again underscores how claims of sexual assault, on both sides of the political spectrum, are either immediately believed or completely ignored depending on whether political points can be scored, and not whether the accusations are actually proven to be true.
I've researched the afterlife for nearly 10 years. I am convinced that Reptilian beings are REAL and that the tunnel of light that people see when they die is a trap.---A now deleted comment mentioned that perhaps one can only be trapped if their consciousness resonates at a low vibration like the reptilians. I think there is wisdom there!Watch "The Matrix Reincarnation Soul Trap" on YouTubehttps://youtu.be/kmXlMUJFTlc
